Flagging in chess is something that a beginner or a casual player might not be aware of, this is natural for people who have never been introduced to the concept of time controls. There is no flagging if there is no time control available to be flagged, some go to master chess without even learning about this term.
This article will go about the most common questions about flagging or a dirty flag, something that you have to be aware of when playing with time controls. There are real ethical questions surrounding this term, keep on reading if you are interested.
Table of Contents
What is flagging in chess?
Flagging in chess refers to the way of playing that intends to make the opponent lose on time rather than lose in material / checkmate, this is usually accompanied with quick no-brainer moves. The idea is to get the opponent to lose on time especially if they are in time trouble, people despise this because the flagger doesn’t even try to win the game normally.
This is usually done by playing quickly in a way that makes no sense whatsoever in the hopes of winning through time, if you put a game that is won through flagging there will be a lot of blunders for the winning side. This is because the moves don’t have to be good, they just have to be quick, this is to increase the likelihood of the opponent losing on time.
This is more prevalent in faster time controls since both players are more likely to be put in a situation where they can lose on time, there is less time on the clock (total) after all. If the time control is something like classical (15+ minutes for both players) then flagging would be rare, the game could likely end before there is a time trouble situation in the first place.
It is important to understand that flagging involves playing quickly with nonsensical moves often in losing possessions, one where there is no hope of winning other than the time requirement. This is why a lot of people hate the act of flaghing, one has to throw away their ability to play chess in order to play the no brainer flagging strategy.
Is flagging illegal in chess?
Flagging is not illegal in formal competitive tournaments and casual games, even at international level (those supervised by fide) it is still condoned. There might be changes in the future but it is not likely to happen, the problem of flagging occurs in online platforms in the first place.
Flagging is despised a lot both by beginners and professional players,but it isn’t so much hated that it is banned from competitive settings. Technically flagging is not illegal in the current state of tournaments, it will probably be legal for any rule adjustments moving forward.
In over the board tournaments where there is no option of premoving (basically indicating a move before it is played) cases of flagging are low, only in online platforms has it become a problem. When you give a couple of online players the ability to premove without any consequences they will abuse it, if it were to be made illegal it will likely be in chess.com or lichess.
The thing with flagging is there is a level of difficulty in identifying whether it is made in the first place, there are some cases of alleged flagging that are not mischievous at all. When you are playing chess there will be times where you will move faster with lesser accuracy, if there is a mechanism to identify this then it might become illegal in the future.
Is flagging ethical?
Setting aside the potential outlaw / banning of flagging in chess, it is important to discuss whether it is ethical due to its mischievous nature. Discussing whether something is unethical is one of the ways to start implementing regulations about it, if we can prove that flagging is unethical then we can make regulations about it.
On one hand one can argue that flagging should be ethical because it still follows the rules of the game, if someone loses on time then it is their fault for not playing quickly. If a player for example has played quickly to conserve time and has made a blunder that way, then it just makes sense that they can still win by using their excess resource of time.
On the other hand it can be said that one should strive to win using their position rather than their time, and there are players who play quickly in hopes of pressuring their opponents. The fact that the flagging option still exists means that more people are going to take advantage of it, it is not ethical since it incentivizes bad behavior.
Flagging has both its ethical and unethical arguments depending on which side you look at, if we are only looking at the rules though it definitely isn’t unethical. But there are those that claim flagging to be a despicable sight at tournament settings and should be eliminated, however we can say that it is legal as of the moment.
What is a dirty flag in chess?
A dirty flag refers to a moment where a player is completely losing in position (usually by -5 points) but still continues to play in order to flag, some say that this is an unfair practice. If someone has been playing well while their opponent only has a king with two pawns it shouldn’t be a win, at least that’s what people think.
A dirty flag and flagging are two completely different cases despite what some people think, a dirty flag is a term used when someone is completely losing and still plays on in hopes of winning on time. Let’s say one only has a king and a pawn against a king and a queen, this position is hopeless no matter how you look at it, but some players still play on.
This is because you can actually still win on time in this position (it will only be a draw if there is only a king), winning on time this way will be considered a dirty flag. A dirty flag is much more than a regular flag, it is one that is more extreme with having much material loss and still winning somehow.
Some actually equivocate the one over the other as if they are the same term, this is not true since flagging doesn’t have to be a “dirty flag”. There are cases of flagging that is acceptable, a dirty flag on the other hand is acceptable in nature and most people would agree that it is a dirty play that shouldn’t be practiced.
Are some cases of flagging in chess acceptable?
There are cases of flagging that is generally acceptable, one of these cases is during a time scramble, basically a situation where both players are low on time and should move very quickly. In these cases both players would unintentionally flag since they don’t want to lose, it doesn’t mean however that this is a “dirty flag”.
Despite what some people think, there is some type of “flagging” that is actually acceptable, if one is in time trouble for example then it would make sense that they would play quickly. In these situations where a player is running out of time their moves will naturally be less accurate, if they win this on time it will be acceptable.
In these cases it is natural to move faster even if your decisions would be less accurate, otherwise you will lose the position without having the opportunity to come back. This doesn’t mean that you have a hidden agenda of flagging the opponent with your losing time, it just so happens that it is the best way that you can save the position.
If you do not move quickly then the opponent will be the one who is to flag you, you’re only winning through this since the time scramble naturally rewards the one who plays quicker. This is way different from a dirty flag where the position is completely losing and you are still playing to win on time (unless it is the case).
Which chess time control has the most cases of flagging?
If we are talking about time controls then the faster ones definitely have the most cases of flagging, this is because players are just like to be in time trouble. In slower time controls where people don’t usually get in time trouble flagging just doesn’t work, the one who tries to flag will just lose.
The blitz and bullet time format see the most number of flagging than any other format due to their lesser time, people can actually have the opportunity to flag since the time is lesser. If it is rapid or classical then flagging would not be as potent since there is so much time, in blitz / bullet there are many who succumb to time trouble than with other formats.
This is even more highlighted in online games since there is the option of “premoving” your moves in order to flag better, especially in chess.com where they allow players to premove some 6+ moves in a row. Coupled with the fact that most online chess players prefer engaging in faster time formats than with slower ones, we see a huge hate for flagging in faster time controls and for online platforms in general.
Is flagging more common on online chess?
Flagging is definitely more prevalent online, this is because players can just premove 6+ moves in a row and throw off their scrambling opponent. Flagging also occurs on over the board games, but since there is no premoving one can usually play without getting overwhelmed.
In over the board games if both sides play to their maximum potential then it can still go both ways, mostly depending on who can move faster. In online avenues where people can premove so many turns in a row this does not apply, it is lazy playing with no skill involved at all.
One of the greatest features of playing chess online is its accessibility, people can play it anywhere without actually setting up a chessboard, but it is also its greatest weakness. Since people who participate on online avenues only want to complete a game or two, they mostly prefer faster time controls.
Again with the preference of online players to play in faster time controls, flagging is becoming more frequent than ever, doing it becomes easier.
Are there cases of flagging in elite chess games?
Some people think that there are no cases of flagging in elite chess since people at this level should set an example, again, this is not true from what we’ve seen so far. In competitive scenarios where people need to win games in order to stay relevant, there will be those who will win whatever it takes, even if it through flagging.
There are many cases of flagging even in elite chess games, at the top where people will do anything to win this is not that surprising. The difference is that the flagging technique usually doesn’t work since their opponents are also professionals, but in frequency it definitely happens at times.
It is important to understand that this is not the norm of elite competitions, where a player wins through flagging there will be criticisms from his/her colleagues. But it does happen since it is unavoidable, there are some situations where even a dirty flag happened (such as in the alireza vs. magnus controversy).
Flagging is a term used to describe a style where a player intentionally moves quicker in hopes of winning on time, there are cases where it is acceptable and there are others where it is unacceptable. This is different from a dirty flag where the position is completely lost and one is still trying to make the opponent lose on time, the latter is much more intolerable.
There are also pieces for flagging that are inevitable and have to occur such as situations of time scramble, it is also legal in any formal chess competitions out there. I hope that this have answered all your questions about flagging in chess, thank you for reading.